🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about the comments made by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is American – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a narrative, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {